Fast byword for kids code#

Culture wars would intensify, reflected in the introduction of wokeness tests for public landmarks such as statues, and purges of academia and the Civil Service to root out anyone deemed insufficiently signed up to Labour’s ‘progressive’ dogma. Just imagine Britain under Prime Minister Starmer. This behemoth would be one element of Labour’s aggressive environmental agenda to achieve net zero emissions, using more green levies, though the result would risk regular blackouts and rising bills.Ī ‘fairer, greener Britain’ – Labour’s conference slogan last week – would, I fear, be translated into a ‘poorer, darker Britain’. Under Starmer, the government machine would grow ever larger through measures such as the creation of a vast state company, Great British Energy, with initial funding of £8 billion to invest in renewables and green technologies.

Fast byword for kids code#

Meanwhile, in the name of inclusion, mollycoddling of public employees would grow through measures encouraging special leave, working from home, and the kind of Fair Work code of practice operating in Scotland to enhance individual ‘wellbeing, security and respect’. In addition to pay increases, union pressures could also lead to the right to strike and form picket lines being made easier. The same is true across the public sector, from Whitehall to the town halls, particularly since the trade unions, which provide 58 per cent of Labour’s funding, would want a return for their financial support. It boasts of cash injections into ‘our NHS’, as Sir Keir calls it with a proprietorial air, but in the absence of health service reform, the money would inevitably be swallowed by unaffordable pay rises and subsidise endemic inefficiencies. It would, I believe, bring social upheaval, conflict and economic decline in its wake Labour’s extra taxes would be used, not to boost growth, but to bankroll the expansion of the benefits system and state bureaucracy.īut make no mistake, despite this veneer of moderation and soothing rhetoric, Labour’s return to power would herald a return of socialism. Such words should send a chill down the spines of entrepreneurs and wealth creators. ‘I am looking at whether and how we tax all different forms of income,’ Sir Keir said last week. There is no evidence that a Starmer government would be any different.Ĭrucially, the party puts wealth redistribution above wealth creation, as reflected in pledges to jack up corporation tax and keep the top 45 per cent income tax band. History tells us that every Labour government since 1929 has presided over a financial crisis because of economic mismanagement. Yet it remains addicted to high taxation and expenditure. The contradiction between the party’s new centrist image and its radical heart can be seen on every front.ĭespite being in government during the financial crisis of 2008, Labour now suddenly poses as the champion of fiscal rectitude.

Pictured: Tony Blair (left) and Gordon Brown (right) in 1997 Its activists want to squeeze the rich, open our borders, dump tradition and roll forward the frontiers of the state.Įchoing Tony Blair – the last Labour leader to win a General Election (and that was as long ago as 2005) – Sir Keir has claimed that Labour is ‘the political wing of the British people’.

Rather than representing ‘the British people’, Labour, especially in its metropolitan base of London, is still in thrall to woke ideology and class envy.

But, in truth, it remains the creature of narrow vested interests, social-justice warriors and shrill pressure groups, all crying out for taxpayer-funded subsidies and special treatment. It would, I believe, bring social upheaval, conflict and economic decline in its wake.Įchoing Tony Blair – the last Labour leader to win a General Election (and that was as long ago as 2005) – Sir Keir has claimed that Labour is ‘the political wing of the British people’. Faced with the Conservatives’ current meltdown over their mini-Budget, Sir Keir’s task is to try to reassure voters about the competence and caution of any future Labour governmentīut make no mistake, despite this veneer of moderation and soothing rhetoric, Labour’s return to power would herald a return of socialism.